Our research
Our research is highly integrative, and borrows from evolutionary ecology, ecophysiology, life history theory, and behavioral ecology to answer one of the most pressing questions facing animal ecologists to date: how do animals cope with challenging and unpredictable conditions? As organismal biologists, we tackle this question across multiple domains (structure, function, evolution) at the level of the organism. We prioritize the study of wild animals in their natural environments and are motivated by a deep interest in uncovering the often inconspicuous strategies that animals have evolved to thrive under environmental instability. We are especially interested in how the trillions of microorganisms that reside in and on their mammalian hosts (collectively, the microbiome) contribute to these strategies.
One way organisms can cope with fluctuating environments is through anticipatory plasticity, a type of phenotypic plasticity where predictive cues of future conditions are used to adaptively adjust phenotypes before the environment changes. This type of plasticity is less understood than other types of plasticity, but appears to be a relatively widespread strategy across the tree of life. Our group is interested in understanding the proximate mechanisms that allow animals to integrate predictive cues, and the evolutionary processes that maintain this integration.
Read more in our recent synthesis here, with a free plain language summary here.

From Petrullo et al., 2025, Functional Ecology. Mediation of anticipatory plasticity by the neuroendocrine system, epigenome and gut microbiota, their putative molecular mechanisms, and their synergies. Interactions among these systems can occur via the gut–brain axis, and through interplay among substrates like short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), stress- and appetite-related hormones and their receptors, and genetic regulatory proteins like histones. Through independent and collective effects of these physiological systems and their connections, animals may sense and integrate predictive cues to coordinate anticipatory phenotypic change.
Many animals can change their phenotypes [observable traits] flexibly depending on the demands of their current environment. When these changes result in a fitness benefit, they can be considered adaptive. In wild red squirrels, many females increase adaptively increase reproductive effort by having more pups in the months before a boom of new food occurs (anticipatory reproduction). But some do not, or instead incorrectly increase reproductive effort in years when new food is low to non-existent. We found that the lifetime fitness cost of responding in low-food years was much lower than the cost of failing to respond in rare high-food years. Females that had more pups in low-food years were more likely to have more pups if they encountered a high-food year in their future. Like anticipatory plasticity, these findings help us to understand how animals may use probabilistic strategies to navigate environmental uncertainty.
.png)
From Petrullo et al., 2023, Science. Overestimating mast cues enhances maternal lifetime fitness. (A) Each false positive error (erroneously producing a large litter in a non-mast year) made across a female’s lifetime significantly decreased her probability of making the costliest error (false negative/small litter in a mast year).
Developmental origins of life history plasticity
An organism's early life conditions can exert significant influence over what the rest of its life looks like. Understanding how early-life events shape developmental, reproductive, and physiological trajectories across the lifespan is a central focus of our group's research. Our work in this area is inherently interdisciplinary, combining theoretical frameworks from across subfields to make predictions about how and when animals will use developmental information to adaptively adjust their life history trajectories and preserce fitness despite a rough start.
Growing up squirrel in the southwest Yukon can be tough. Predators abound, winters are extremely cold, food is not consistently available and finding a vacant territory is key in order to survive in the short-term. In line with data from humans and non-human animals (birds, other mammals), juvenile red squirrels that experience a lot of hardship in their first year of life tend to live shorter total lives (i.e., reduced adult lifespan). We have previously shown that a high-quality environment in the second year of life can offset some of this effect. But what does this mean for lifetime fitness? Are juveniles that experienced developmental hardship "doomed" to poorer fitness, or can they compensate for early-life adversity by reorganizing their life history trajectories, given a shorter lifespan?
